LLM Content Audit: The 30-Point Checklist I Use for Clients
After testing this checklist on my own content and a handful of client sites, I've learned what actually makes LLMs want to cite you (and what instantly disqualifies your content).
The client problem that shows why most content audits miss the point
Last month, a client came to me frustrated. They'd been working with an agency for months on "AI optimization" - their content looked great on paper: well-structured, keyword-optimized, technically sound. But when I tested it with ChatGPT and Claude, zero citations. Nothing.
I ran this 30-point audit on their site. Score: 28 out of 100. Their "AI-optimized" content was missing the fundamental elements that actually make LLMs want to cite you. After fixing the real issues, they started getting referenced consistently in AI responses.
The problem isn't that LLM optimization is complicated. It's that most people are optimizing for the wrong things. They focus on technical setup while ignoring content structure. They chase keyword density while missing expertise signals. They follow generic AI SEO advice instead of understanding what actually makes content citation-worthy.
What this interactive audit reveals:
- •Real-time scoring showing your content's citation probability
- •The 30 specific elements that determine LLM citation decisions
- •Which content elements to fix first for maximum impact
- •Immediate feedback on how citation-ready your content is
- •The difference between content that gets cited vs. content that gets ignored
Use this interactive checklist to audit your content in real-time. Each item you check adds to your overall score, giving you immediate feedback on how citation-ready your content is.
Interactive Content Audit
Check off each item that applies to your content. Your score updates in real-time to show how citation-ready your content is.
Foundation Elements (1-10)
Authority Signals (11-20)
Advanced Optimization (21-30)
Testing your improvements: How to verify LLM optimization is working
After you fix the issues this audit identifies, you need to test whether your improvements are actually working. Here's my systematic approach for validation:
Week 1: Direct Testing
- Ask ChatGPT specific questions your content should answer
- Test Claude with industry-specific queries related to your expertise
- Check Perplexity for citations when searching your core topics
- Document which content gets referenced vs. ignored
Week 2-4: Performance Monitoring
- Track mentions of your brand or methodology in AI responses
- Monitor referral traffic from AI tools (if measurable)
- Search for your specific phrases or frameworks being cited
- Compare citation frequency before/after optimization
The reality check: What happens when you ignore LLM optimization
I recently analyzed competitors in the AI marketing space. The businesses consistently getting cited by LLMs scored 75+ on this checklist. The ones being ignored? Average score of 31. The gap is only widening as more people search using AI tools instead of traditional Google searches.
Here's what I'm seeing in 2025: Companies with high LLM citation rates are getting 40-60% more qualified inbound leads compared to 2024. Meanwhile, businesses that haven't adapted are seeing decreased visibility as search behavior shifts toward AI tools.
The window for easy wins is closing. Right now, most of your competitors probably score below 50 on this checklist. But that's changing fast as more businesses wake up to LLM optimization. The companies that act now get the advantage of building authority while the competition is still focused on traditional SEO.
Want me to audit your content using this checklist?
I'll personally run this 30-point audit on your top 5 pieces of content and provide a detailed action plan for improving your LLM citation rate.
What you get:
- • Complete 30-point audit of your content
- • Prioritized action plan with quick wins highlighted
- • Specific recommendations for your industry
- • Follow-up testing protocol to measure improvements
❓People Also Ask: LLM Content Auditing
How often should I audit my content for LLM optimization?
Quarterly audits work for most businesses, but check monthly if you're actively publishing new content. AI systems evolve rapidly, so what worked six months ago might not be optimal today. I recommend a full audit whenever you notice declining citation rates or launch new content initiatives.
Can I fix all 30 points at once or should I prioritize?
Start with foundation elements (points 1-10) - these have the biggest impact and can be fixed quickly. Then tackle authority signals (11-20) because they differentiate you from competitors. Save advanced optimization (21-30) for content that's already performing well on the first 20 points.
What's a realistic timeline to see LLM citation improvements?
Technical fixes show results within 2-4 weeks. Authority signals take 6-8 weeks to impact citation rates. Full optimization typically shows meaningful results within 3 months. However, quick wins like adding specific numbers or FAQ sections can improve discoverability within days.
Should I audit all my content or focus on top-performing pages?
Start with your 5-10 most important pages - typically your pillar content, service pages, and highest-traffic articles. Optimizing these creates the biggest impact. Once you see results, expand to supporting content. Don't waste time optimizing thin or outdated content.
Do different LLMs prefer different optimization approaches?
The core principles work across all major LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity), but some nuances exist. ChatGPT favors structured data and clear authority signals. Claude prefers comprehensive analysis and balanced perspectives. Focus on universal optimization first, then fine-tune for specific systems.
What's the biggest mistake people make when auditing for LLM optimization?
Focusing on technical elements while ignoring content quality and authority signals. You can have perfect schema markup and llms.txt files, but if your content lacks expertise markers and citation-worthy insights, LLMs won't reference it. Authority and value always trump technical perfection.
Related Articles
Making Your Website LLM-Friendly: Technical Optimization Guide
Technical implementation guide including llms.txt setup, schema markup, and content structure
Read article
How to Get Content Cited by AI Systems: LLM Ranking Strategy
Platform strategies and content approaches that get your expertise cited by AI systems
Read article
LLM Content Creation for SEO: Advanced Prompting Strategies
Strategic framework for creating content that ranks in both traditional and AI-powered search
Read article